The Bible says that the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Jesus said that we can not serve both God and mammon. The word mammon is a name for money, treasure, or riches, in the context of it being a source of life. Many of God's people were very rich. But they gained wealth, as Solomon did. Solomon's humility was not that he didn't want anything. His humility, when God asked him what he wanted, was that he put emphasis not on the physical world, but on the spiritual. Wisdom and knowledge do pertain to marriage, as wisdom symbolizes woman, and knowledge man and woman together. The basis of life, is in the spiritual. And this is also true in relationships.

Some people however, regard money as it being a grey area, concerning real treasure. Like taking what is said about money in the Bible, and then saying that we need it, but we don't worship it. But that doesn't have any substance of truth at the root. The Synagogue of Satan, as mentioned in Revelation, firstly is founded on this same kind of doctrine, as the love of money. Just as also, Satan tempted Jesus with physical prosperity. However, Satan has no deals that are actually good. They all end in having only temporal life, and that not even existing in the true substance of life. The synagogue of Satan is that middle ground that exists, where the fullness and oneness of God and love are not found, but rather there is the striving for things which are not the substance of real life. And the striving in the synagogue of Satan also still exists when those who are given over to him are hanging on to their last thread. What most people don't realize, is that just as true life is spiritual, that the synagogue of Satan is also spiritual. And therefore it is not that it isn't existing just because the physical looks alright. The depths of Satan are thinking that we are sinners and that that is the way it is. When Babylon came to conquer Israel, the leaders and most valiant people were hanging on to their last thread. And these things happen, in being given over to Satan, whether there is physical prosperity or not, because people have a place in their lives, where the fullness and oneness of life, God, and love, is not actually present. And they also may know that, in any degree. But they do not want to come into the light of God in this, because they know that they have been given over to something, in which also they have a debt, that if they choose to come into the light, they will be found out. Whether this is pertaining to someone who is respected or not. And this is the description in John 3 about not coming into the light, and it is the context in Revelation 12 speaking about people who love their lives to the death. God told Israel in Jeremiah, when Babylon was coming to conquer them, that if they tried to fight against Babylon, that they would lose; but that if they didn't fight, they would still live. And God had come to them, and had wanted them to turn to Him, so that Babylon would not come at all.

The lukewarm foundation of sand, may have prosperity in it, though it is only temporal. Just as they spoke of in Job, and also just as Psalm 49 shows. Psalm 49 shows how true life is in the spiritual, and that also pertaining to the person, and not the actual physical benefits found in the world. Psalm 49 shows that the spiritual is where true sincerity is, and even then as shown in the Bible, God promises that after coming into that sincerity, that there will be physical prosperity, though sometimes not right away. But what loss is there, when the true sincerity is sought? Because anything that happens, is only more reason to cleave unto that true love.

What happens is that people do not want to gain that true sincerity, because they know that they will have to come into the light regarding the things they have 'contracted' regarding what is not true sincerity. And so they go on into believing things, in this type of way, in this example of money: "it's not evil, just don't let it get out of control."

Before the Civil War, the setup between the North and the South, was nearly just as Capitalism verses Communism. Even as America was being founded, one American said that slavery was as having a wolf by the ears. America's constitution boldly said that under God every man was created equal. However, slavery still existed even then. There were different reasons, as to the different motivations, concerning the people who settled America. But America was founded in the proclamation of freedom. But what ensued after the first settlings of America was anything but that. And the way that America began, in it's expansion, nearly included the type of reasoning such as "you have to break an egg to make an omelet." With the settling of America, and the differences in motivations from the different colonizations, it is actually very hypocritical, as to how any kind of people could be fought against. The main synopsis of America's growth from it's colonies is that people fought and allied with different people, and when the dust cleared, the Colonials were holding the power. One point, is that at the end of the American Revolution, in which the Colonialists were fighting the British (the British, were being aided by the Native Americans, as the natives didn't want the colonial expansion to progress) that the British gave the Colonialists the deeds to Indian lands, without telling the Indians. And then the further expansion of Americans into North America, was nearly in this same fashion.

However, in hindsight, I would like to know which country ever has come to power, without conquering other countries or peoples. None have. Even Native Americans fought against each other, though some did not as their primary way of life. In the end though, however, every human has come from the same place. And therefore, who is better than anyone? The people who show themselves as to having the least amount of violence? Or having the best reason for coming to power?

The spirit of grecia, which is the antichrist spirit coming out of the pit, as explained in Daniel and Revelation, is the spirit of violence. The goat and ram vision in Daniel, shows the spirit of grecia to be the spirit of the antichrist. And the functions of the seven heads of Satan, who are the ruling spirits under him, and who are the their characteristics of him, and the seven countries that were over Israel show the spirit of grecia to be the spirit of violence. But in the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation, it is shown how the antichrist spirit is warred against, by the south and the east. The south represents Egypt. And one main thing about Egypt, is simplicity, also how they thought shepherds were an abomination. And in this then, believing that everyone had their own way to a god. The false peace covenant of the Antichrist, is in having a peace treaty that is to be common, but which denies Jesus, also being lawless, being neither fully for or against God. This gives the ground for cunning and deceit, and this also gives place for the kind of thing that happened to the Native Americans concerning how America gained it's land. And it is the fulfillment of the perdition of the Antichrist, that he ends up standing up after having the peace treaty, seeking to instill himself as the one ruler over all. And this is why the south and the east war with him. Spiritually, every one has this battle in their own life, and pertaining to different people and things. The east pertains to Persia mainly, which also had extended into Asia. China is one of the only strong countries that has not sought to rule over other countries. Even as Vietnam was being supplied by China, but Vietnam was still it's own country. Iran, is the modern day dwelling place of Persia, though Persia used to extend into Asia as well. The south mainly also represents Capitalism, and the east communism. The veil of Communism, is that it claims to be a diplomacy, and as a republic. Even though the spirit of grecia is a spirit of violence, it still was a commoners' government, according to those who were under it. The shortcomings of democracy is that as soon as people come together in democracy, there is a republic. The problem with the different governments of the world, is that it is nearly as the colonies taking America- each has their own allies and enemies, and whoever has the power when the dust clears, wins. The American government differs however from every other government, as it's government contains a system of checks and balances. And this is why America has succeeded so much, even at extensive costs. And this is also why America and it's allies do not want to see other countries that are diplomacies without checks and balances, to come into power, and this concerning being nuclear.

But in these things, if any country wants to instill itself in the propagation of itself, also putting America down, it must deal with the hypocrisy of doing just as America did. And what about America? Our country is founded on a God who gives repentance. Is any country going to say that their history does not include doing wrong things? Or is any country going to claim that they are presently without error? Then let that country bring forth it's strong reasons and present synopsis, and let it tell the former things, and the things that are to come. And let us come near together for judgment.

The Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of the American Government come to rightly balance the shortcomings of democratic, republican, communistic, and capitalistic governments. This system of balance differs from any kind of communistic government that could claim to be diplomatic, because the diplomat is kept in check through the other branches of the government.

Communism is actually the same as the spirit of antichrist. Because it has a veil through it's false peace, and lawlessness, being neither fully for or against God and actual truth, but the problem is that one diplomat is ruling without the checks and balances of the government, along with the freedom of the people under it.