Preface:
Discrimination is a serious thing, and the outlooks of most of Christianity actually leads into discrimination, and this is the number one reason that Christianity is nearly outlawed by the government and secular organizations and people. Though God does give the foundation regarding what pleases Him, Jesus, the Spirit, the Father, and the Bible do not in any way discriminate. The biggest way that the church begins to discriminate, is through attempting to tell people that they are going to Hell, and then also use that as a motivation in it's 'evangelism,' and 'preaching.' Paul said that he became like all men, to be able to save all men, and Jesus gave the parable of the Good Samaritan. The parable of the good Samaritan actually goes above and beyond the foundation of what pleases God. The underlying truth in the parable of the Good Samaritan, in the context of the second commandment, which is to love our neighbor as ourselves, is fulfilled, as Jesus said that our neighbors are the people that we make ourselves a neighbor to, just as Jesus also said to treat others like we would want to be treated. The entire basis for tough love can be found in what could be called 'the transgression of Eve,' just as Paul spoke about the transgression of Adam. The transgression of Eve is summed up in knowing that she was deceived, but did not sin until she ate of the fruit, even though she was deceived in doing so, because she only had the knowledge of good, as a child, and did not have the knowledge of good and evil before she ate of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil, and therefore her intents were not wrong, though she was wrong in eating the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. And the entire definition for tough love is found in how Satan deceived her: he essentially told her that God commanded them not to eat of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil, so that they could gain the initiative to do so, and thus be like God, who knows what is right and what is wrong based on His own initiative. And this is why gaining the initiative is not really godly, though people can gain their own will and initiative and seem holy and humble. In going on from this, just as Adam also sinned, having the will to do good, but not knowing how to perform what was good, and as he was not deceived, and just as Adam and Eve both answered the LORD after having eaten of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil, with excuses, so is the foundation for giving excuses found in having a just claim or cause that is rooted in not willfully sinning, but falling because of ignorance. Why can't Satan be saved then, and also have the testimony of being ignorant, and not willfully sinning? Because when Satan fell, after tasting of the knowledge of incorruption, through the knowledge of good and evil, but not partaking of the knowledge of incorruption, he willfully chose to remain ignorant concerning the knowledge of God, and that is what leads into falling away beyond renewal. One major point regarding 'the transgression of Eve' is that what she thought she was doing, was not sinful, because it is not sinful to want to be like God, which is what she thought she was doing. The difference, between being like God in a good sense, or trying to be like Him in an evil sense, is found in whether or not God remains Supreme to a person, and whether or not He is still the source of a person's life. And this is actually also the very foundation of what I have spoken about concerning God subjecting creation to futility, but giving abundantly above all that we could ask or think, as His manifold wisdom gives us to be able to know Him in bounds that include His foreknowledge, and to also have our lives and inheritances be unable to fall away. The biggest problem with tough love, is that it seeks to teach people to learn from their sins, and to learn from mistakes, when the truth of the Spirit, is that we can only learn through light, not darkness. And it is in this way, whether or not someone would call my stance on this esoteric, that Jesus remains our Teacher, as He said that we can only have one Teacher, which is Him, just as we learn from salvation, as that is what the name Jesus means. The foundation for us not being able to learn from anyone else, is found in how Jesus is supreme, even though one of the gifts of the Spirit, includes us being able to be teachers, and thus Jesus is the one who is teaching through people, just as we are to be one with Him. And this is the fullness of the Promise in Jeremiah and Hebrews, which says that we shall have the Law written on the heart and mind, and that no one will be teaching others, saying "know God," because all who love Him will know Him. Not even the Law of Moses, which was a tutor until Christ came, teaches people to learn through sin or mistakes, even though the Law was given to expose sin. The Law of Moses was actually given to keep people from attempting to learn from darkness, as darkness can also be knowledge that is not yet revealed, just as the Law was given as a temporary shield until Christ came. This shows the Law of Moses to be the exact root that should be present in place of attempting to learn from darkness, and even more so, through the fullness of the new covenant, by which we may be born again inwardly incorruptible, the Law is written on the heart and mind unable to be broken, furthering the truth of God's will giving us to not learn from sin, but from His Spirit. Therefore the Law of Moses was given so that people would not learn from darkness, even though the Messiah had not yet come. If Christ is the light, and darkness can represent knowledge that is not yet revealed, then how did the Law lead unto learning from God's Spirit, if the Law was given before the Messiah came? Because the Law in this way, is directly symbolized with the Spirit of Repentance, just as John the Baptist was Elijah who was to come, and the Spirit of Elijah is the Spirit of Repentance, and thus John was bearing witness of the light, as the Bible says, and the Law of Moses did this as well, both without attempting to teach through darkness. And how did the law do this, and how does the Spirit of Repentance do this? Through the truth of what repentance is, and what it means to believe and to confess, just as repentance is not turning 180 degrees from sin, but actually means to prepare the way of the LORD. Therefore the first foundation regarding learning from God's Spirit, is to think of one's self in light of Him, just as that is the true meaning of repentance, even as the very word repentance means 'after-thought,' which is done through having 'fore-thought,' or the foreknowledge of God, as a person believes and confesses in this way: "I should have," "I would have," and or "I could have," being convicted and compelled unto HIS LOVE. New age has actually attempted to take the very root and foundation of repentance away, through making "I should have," "I would have," and "I could have," into being impractical, and thus wrong. But the entire nature of conviction is found in what we should have, would have, and could have done, if we had known God, through being one with Him.

One of the worst ways to discriminate is to begin to speak about someone, through using a pronoun. Like saying 'they,' or 'them' in a negative way. This begins to condemn people, and it seeks to humiliate people through merely using a pronoun, and not addressing someone directly.

It could seem as if my doctrine concerning marriage in heaven, is in agreement with homosexuality, but it is not. And I do not believe that it can truthfully be interpreted that way. I strongly believe that if I can not give someone beauty for ashes, that I can not really attempt to witness to them, and I do not believe that anyone should attempt to witness to anybody else without giving them beauty for ashes. I believe this to be true, just as trying to witness without giving beauty for ashes, is actually how to give ultimatums, and we can read in the gospels about how Jesus lived around sinners. And on top of this, all sin agrees with every sin, and to break one command is to break the whole Law, and therefore without the truth of the new birth, we are all sinning in every way, and are sinners in every way. Paul did say that no idolater or sexually immoral person has an inheritance in the kingdom of God, but we also must discern that the kingdom of God can live inside of us through the new birth, and thus the kingdom of God can be present even now, and is not just confined to whether or not someone goes to heaven in the future, when they die, or when the heavens and earth are created anew incorruptible. And this is why and how it is so important to not witness without giving beauty for ashes, because just giving commands concerning what pleases God does nothing except confine someone under sin and condemnation. Through giving beauty for ashes, the Spirit is able to be known in truth and love, just as attempting to preach or evangelize about is right and or wrong, without doing so, always falls short, because if a person does not firstly believe in God, it is not likely that they are going to begin to walk according to what they are told will please Him.

To attempt to preach and or evangelize without the foreknowledge of God, leads into the leaven of the Pharisees, as Jesus said that they travelled to gain one student, but merely made him twice the son of Hell they were. When God subjected creation to futility, He hollowed out the truth, preparing to fill it, with the structure of how right and wrong can only supremely and lastingly be found in His foreknowledge, and this is how trying to witness without giving beauty for ashes, leads into what Peter said about people being worse off, after having known the truth, but having fallen away from it. Why and how can someone fall away? Through having the motive that attempts to believe in what is right and wrong, without the foreknowledge of God, and the birth in Him which is incorruptible- unable to fall away. The knowledge of good and evil is present in the knowledge of incorruption, but through the knowledge of incorruption there is no lack of knowledge. Even if a person knows what is right and what is wrong, having the knowledge of good and evil, even as the fallen angels had, and were good before they fell, without understanding that the very topic of incorruption brings up the topic of the ability to corrupt and fall away, and in an eternal sense, then there can not also be the very POSSESSION of what CAN not fall away, and the very divine, comforting, and joyful truth of how one's life and inheritance WILL not fall away, no matter what.

The fact that copper has a low resistance, in being a conductor of electricity, symbolizes how when our judgment is in the Spirit, and not by sight, works, or the flesh, (as copper, bronze, and brass symbolize judgment), that no matter what we may face, which resists the kingdom of God, we can always overcome in Christ, even as Peter was the little rock the church is built on, as Peter has the testimony of having denied the LORD three times, but having been restored by Him and even still accepted by Him, personally, and for ministry. So whether or not we are facing giants, as Joshua did, or facing something small, as Christ said that he who is faithful in little is also faithful in much, we can know that our promises in Him are incorruptible, and that His Promises are actually what we witness with, just as the name of Jesus means salvation.

The summation of these things, is directly connected to what the Bible and the Spirit say about the light, which is Christ, saying that the darkness can not comprehend it. And thus, as Jesus said that only what is born of the Spirit can enter into the kingdom of God, no one who learns from darkness, though they may seem to have good works, and a right standing with God, can enter into His kingdom and also remain forever. And this is the very root of what is happening with people who think they are saved, but are cast into outer darkness, as Jesus speaks about. Peter actually said that it would be better for those who fell away from the truth of what is right and what is wrong, to have not even known what was right and wrong in the first place. And this is the context that Jesus says in Revelation: “Let he who is unjust and filthy be unjust and filthy still.” Though that may sound like what Christianity thought that the Antichrist and false prophet were going to deceive the world and church with, this is actually still the foundation of what God said in Isaiah 35, concerning the path that not even a fool can stray from, and this is completely true in God, as it does not please Him to merely give people His commands concerning what is right and wrong, especially if they don’t even believe in Him in the first place. It pleases Him to witness by giving beauty for ashes, as it is His Promises and His people’s inheritance which conveys His full name, just as Revelation speaks about the ‘everlasting gospel.’ Therefore, even for those who do believe in God, it is impossible to fully please Him just by attempting to follow His commandments, or believe that they are godly because they attempt to say that they worship God wanting nothing but Him. Because the very Person of who God is, is found in what He wants to give us. In this way, Sardis, is as Isaiah 65’s “I am holier,” and Laodicea is as Isaiah 65’s “Gad” and “Meni.” To attempt to witness to anyone, without the oneness of God, is actually lawlessness, though people may claim that they are following God’s commandments, and it is in this way, that just attempting, for example, to ensure that gay marriage does not become fully legal in our country, does not really please God, if the country as a whole is not going to proclaim Jesus as Savior and abide in Him. And therefore, as Jesus spoke in Revelation 22:11, and as Peter wrote, it would be better for people to not receive the truth about what is right or wrong, without continuing in God, let alone the judgment that shall come upon anyone who attempts to put anyone else under any command, or proclaimed truth of what is right or wrong, if they themselves do not abide in His oneness. And furthermore, this still does not enter into His oneness or kingdom, because no one who sins is actually really free, because true freedom is only found in the oneness of God.

Knowing that Abdullah is the eighth king, and the Antichrist, through the things mentioned here, we may receive discernment regarding who the false prophet is. The Roman Catholic church has already been thought of as the harlot riding the beast, and the harlot is different than the false prophet, as the harlot is destroyed first. The Roman Catholic church is embedded in falsehood, just as Thyatira. Jezebel is fore-mostly the false prophet, and the Roman Catholic church has sinned, as being the church of Thyatira, having allowing Jezebel, and this is true, just as one of Jezebel’s name, as in the Bible, is “The Queen of heaven,” which is what the Roman Catholics actually call Mary. The Bible shows that God gave Jezebel time to repent, and within this, the exposition of who the false prophet is, becomes exposed through Isaiah 66, as God says “Those who say to you: “let the LORD be glorified, that we may see your joy;” they shall all be ashamed.” This verse in Isaiah 66 gives the precedent of whether or not someone actually overcomes out of the wickedness of Thyatira, and repents as God gives time to do so. Going on from this, as the Pope is thought of as the one leader of the church, and as the people follow him, and according to the blasphemies and heresies that are included in their doctrine, whether as visible as praying to “The Queen of heaven” or not, the false prophet would be the Pope himself, while the people under him would be the harlot. And this is true, just as the Catholics commanded that their ministers not become married, as Paul spoke against, and just as it does not fully please God to just have people attempt to follow His commandments. And it is in this way, that no one who walks according to these falsehoods can actually enter into the true kingdom of God, and remain there, with their inheritance as well. And we may also find that when we actually receive beauty for ashes from the LORD, that we do not still walk according to what the ashes were. Meaning that just attempting to say that praying to Mary as the Queen of heaven, is beauty for ashes, concerning Jezebel being the Queen of heaven, does not actually enter into God’s oneness and kingdom. Why and why not? For the same reason that God is not pleased with those who walk according to what is right in their own sight, as He also says it does not please Him when people walk according to the dictates of their own heart, mind, and thoughts. It is more pleasing in His sight, when people acknowledge what is right and wrong according to God, then when they do it according to their own judgments, but then even in this, to falsely declare what is right and wrong concerning God is wicked, just as it is evil to completely take away the truth of the new birth, as that leads into the depths of Satan, and is the essence of Isaiah 66:5b. Is it contradictory to say that we should acknowledge right and wrong according to God, but that we shouldn’t witness through that, or think that our salvation and life is found in that? No. There is a difference between a sinner knowing he is a sinner, and a religious person thinking he is in right standing with God when he is not, and a person who is really abiding in God, and a person who is abiding in God and the new birth but who still has corruption in his own flesh. To merely replace Jezebel with Mary is not actually true in the Spirit, because it is Jerusalem which is the mother of those who believe. Roman Catholicism says that Mary is the Mother of God, however, even though Jesus is God, and is a Man, the correlation between these things is found in how Mary is the mother of Jesus through His name “The Son of Man,” but she is not the mother of God. Therefore the Promise comes through understanding that what is feminine, represents creation being like Jesus, the Spirit, and the Father, while what is masculine represents the Supremacy of God. And just because Paul wrote about there no longer being male and female in God, does not mean that the testimonies of male and female have been taken away, or why still call us ‘sons of God,’ or Jesus the “Son of Man?” And concerning Catholicism, if they can not believe in eternal monogamous marriage in heaven for created beings, then why still pray to what is feminine, regarding Mary? The Promise and kingdom of God is found in the fulfillment of things, just as in Christ we have the testimonies of both male and female, and eternal monogamous marriage in heaven for created beings, as I have also shown previously.