Now, it seems to me that at this time it would be good to further show the actual and real truth of how every being is saved, as I have been going over in my previous posts. I do not feel like reviewing every bit of information that has previously been given about this like I usually do because I think there are too many things to include. However, I will say this: the knowledge of good and evil gives you the ability to think. It gives you an endless stream of data to dissect each and every part of anything and everything. You may think: won't that make me tired? Or what if I become aware of something that I do not want to think about? Or what if I develop an overactive mind? And isn't the knowledge of good and evil non-singular? And shouldn't I be singular, as the real meaning of the word that Paul used when he said to not become deceived as Eve was, but to remember the singleness, purity, and genuineness of Christ? Well, God is one, but He is also three; and the Spirit is one, but He is also many. The thing is, yes we are supposed to be singular. But what does that mean? Only having the knowledge of good, and not the knowledge of good and evil is singular. However, just as the knowledge of good and evil is the knowledge of HOW things are right or wrong (not just knowing what is right and wrong, but knowing HOW, as Adam and Eve knew it was wrong to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, even though they didn't have the knowledge of good and evil itself), so is it possible to still be singular within the realm of it. The 'trick' is that the singlular knowledge of good should be the goal of all that is cultivated with the knowledge of good and evil. So it's like the knowledge of good and evil (which is plural as there are two things at hand: good and evil) is a math problem and the singular knowledge of good is the answer. But aren't there many answers (plural) to many of life's 'problems?' Yes, but there will always be a singular answer to those answers when they are put together.

Also, in viewing the reality of everyone being saved, even fallen beings like Satan, and with looking at what I said about how there is a context where they aren't saved, and one where they are, we may know some things. Firstly, the knowledge that says that they aren't saved, is the knowledge of evil; and the knowledge that says they are saved is the knowledge of good. But how can it be evil to say that they aren't saved, if the Bible shows them forever being tortured in the lake of fire? Herein we come to the realm of concept and testimony. The lake of fire is a part of the knowledge of evil, but having that knowledge in itself isn't evil, just as God will look on the lake of fire and thus have the knowledge of evil but not Himself be evil. But didn't I just say that the knowledge of them not being saved and thus being in the lake of fire is evil? Yes it is. But here is the thing, which I believe is true throughout all of God's word: God gives us the bad news (evil), the good news (good), the better news (that we can overcome evil with good), and the best news (that we can save the evil). So all that stuff about the Antichrist in Revelation is true and is the knowledge of evil, but it's the bad news. The lake of fire is the bad news. Outer darkness is the bad news. But that's not the end of the matter.

The knowledge of evil in itself isn't evil. God has the knowledge of [what is] evil and isn't Himself evil. So when does the knowledge of evil become sin? When we consummate it through not just knowing about it, but doing it? Not necessarily, because God works all things for good. And aren't snakes symbols of evil? And yet look at Moses' staff and the bronze serpent. And wasn't Christ's body becoming sin and dying evil? Yes, but look how that worked out. The knowledge of evil becomes evil to us through the very existence of the speaking idol, which also is a direct reflection of how the Antichrist comes from what is not established. Herein lies the speaking idol: you have the knowledge of something, whether good or evil, but you don't have the network, history, pathways, or understanding that properly puts that knowledge into context. Thus ignorance is not bliss and just not wanting an overactive mind, or just not wanting to think about things that we don't really want to know about isn't an excuse. Ignorance is the root of the Antichrist and to what is not established. When all is perfect, sinless, and incorruptible in the new heavens and earth, the only thing we aren't going to know is 'the name that no one knows,' which is a gift from God. Even Jesus will have a name that no one else knows. That name that no one else knows is the essence of what makes us unique. And it is the place of privacy. But that doesn't mean that no one else isn't going to be able to somewhat share in that knowledge. Because just as Song of Songs is a book about private things, it reveals those private things discreetly through symbol and testimony. Therefore the fruit of our name that no one else knows can be shared with other people. It's like this, in uniqueness someone may have a peculiar nature that no one else has, but through being able to see that nature become fruitful in life other people can come unto sharing that nature and even becoming like that themselves. Kind of like having the same kind of sense of humor. In reality, it is impossible for anyone else to come unto knowing someone else's name that isn't supposed to be known, just as it is impossible for a perfect, sinless, incorruptible, born again heart to come unto sinning. So there is some relief of privacy. However, things may happen which may make it seem like we have no privacy, especially when we have a physical body that isn't incorruptible. But we have to remind ourselves of what it really means to have a portion of ourselves that no one else knows, and we have to be able to put things into context. And I have more to say about this, but not yet.

If we look at the testimony in Revelation about the outer court of the temple being trampled down, we may know this: that the outer court is the physical body, and that Jesus' outward body became sin and died. That was His sacrifice. What does it mean to trample on that sacrifice, as other places of the Bible, like Hebrews, talk about trampling upon the blood of His covenant and insulting the Spirit of Grace? To trample upon Christ's blood and to trample upon the outer court is to not resepct that sacrifice. And we are all supposed to have that same kind of sacrifice.

A lot of people think ignorance is bliss, especially when there are things in life that they personally would rather not know about. But that doesn't make ignorance the right answer. It's like this: someone's aware of something they'd rather not be, so they love things that let them lack knowledge, though they might not call it ignorance. But the real answer is being able to put the things that we might not want to think about into the right context; which is how light encompasses darkness and how there is no darkness in God though there is within Him the knowledge of darkness/evil.

Maybe our problem isn't the aspect of thinking things we'd rather not, but doing things or having things being done to us that are wrong. The only answer is that Jesus saves, and that through faith, miracles, and His Spirit we will receive the best.

I may have more on all of this.